Convergent & Divergent Thinking

tree branching out with mouths, line drawing, simple, --ar 24:9

Imagine a tree

At the end of each branch is an option. This tree is the conversation we have when diverging and converging. It can feel difficult to switch to different limbs when people are climbing different sections of the tree — some exploring branches, whilst others return to the trunk.

The Trouble

Difficulties arise when interlocutors fail to recognize the divergent and convergent modes of thinking. Feedback in a convergent mode, which involves narrowing options, can be frustrating to those engaged in divergent thinking. To help each other out — allocate time for both modes of thinking.

¿Por qué no los dos?

The integration of convergent and divergent thinking is vital. Transitions between modes can be challenging, but ultimately lead to more effective solutions. Taking a break or shifting the focus of the discussion can help reset the mind for a new approach. Shifting between modes requires attention and intentionality. Recognizing which mode is being utilized, and communicating feedback effectively, will help create optimal design outcomes.

When building software I sometimes switch between these modes. Should we use the Builder Pattern? Would a Phantom Type be useful here? What about the color purple — are you no stranger to Flummoxing Feedback?

Convergent & Divergent Thinking
Interactive graph
On this page
Imagine a tree
The Trouble
¿Por qué no los dos?